Economically speaking, is it better to be an engaged history major or a begrudging math major?
A new study suggests that engagement is more important than content in most cases. That tracks with what I’ve seen.
For better or worse, most people aren’t great actors. They have a hard time faking enthusiasm over the long term. Even if they manage to fool other people, they don’t quite fool themselves. They quit, or drag their feet, or sabotage themselves just to get out of doing what they really don’t want to do. If that thing is your full-time job, you’re in for a rough ride.
Being successful in competitive fields involves putting in an unreasonable amount of effort. Putting in that extra effort is that much harder if you don’t like it in the first place.
That doesn’t just apply to graduates. It’s crucial for persistence in a degree program.
That’s a tough message to send to parents and/or legislators. They believe strongly that a given major fits a student for a given job. And there are some fields, like nursing, where that’s true.
But most college graduates over the age of, say, 30, don’t work in jobs that reflect their majors. That’s not how it works.
I’m increasingly a fan of very early courses that expose students to a range of modes of inquiry and where they can lead. Students often don’t know what the options are or what they mean. It’s one thing to see “sociology” in a catalog; it’s quite another to have a sense of what that means in practice.
(I’ve even got a sample course mapped out in my head. For an Intro to Social Sciences, take a theme like power or family. Every few sessions, apply a different disciplinary lens to that theme. Here’s how psychologists look at power; here’s how sociologists do; here’s how political scientists do. Which one made the most sense to you? That’s your major. It’s a sort of intellectual sampler platter.)
I’ve seen students struggle mightily until they changed majors, at which point they flourished. The ability was always there, but until the spirit was willing, they underperformed.
Admittedly, this perspective raises questions.
What if the thing you love doing doesn’t pay well, or at all? Enjoyment isn’t a binary variable. Even if your dream job is taken, you probably like some alternatives more than others. (Put differently, even great jobs have their downsides. As much as I enjoyed teaching, I never acquired a taste for grading papers.) Instead of feeling guilty about trying to enjoy your work, look at it as increasing your odds of success: you’re likelier to go the extra mile when you enjoy, or at least don’t hate, the journey.
What if you haven’t found anything you like yet? This is where the “sampler platter” course could come in, as well as career interest inventories. Alternately, for some people, it may make sense to do other things before college; what feels like apathy can be academic burnout. I’ve had students in their 30s and 40s tell me without shame that they were indifferent students at 18; they needed to grow up before they could take college seriously.
Ultimately, it’s about self-awareness. Figuring out where your tastes and talents fit is likelier to end well than just trying to slot yourself into a given field because it’s supposedly hot. Which raises the question of how to teach self-awareness at scale. How hard could that possibly be … ?
ServeU to introduce revolutionary ‘ServeU AI TaskMaster’ app powered by ChatGPT
The app has been developed in-house to transform facilities management industry with multilingual support
March 22, 2023
ServeU, a leading facilities management (FM) solutions provider in the UAE and a subsidiary of Union Properties, is set to launch its groundbreaking app, ServeU AI TaskMaster, powered by ChatGPT. This revolutionary AI-driven application, developed entirely by ServeU’s in-house development team, seamlessly integrates innovative technologies with FM operations to set new industry benchmarks and provide exceptional services to clients. In addition, the app will offer multilingual support, catering to a diverse workforce with languages including Hindi, Urdu, Tamil, Malayalam, Bengali, Nepali, and Sinhalese.
ServeU recently invested in an in-house development team to drive innovation and maintain a competitive edge in the FM industry. The successful development and launch of the ServeU AI TaskMaster app is a testament to the team’s expertise and the company’s commitment to embracing latest technological innovations.
Gary Reader, General Manager of ServeU, stated: “We are thrilled to be unveiling the ServeU AI TaskMaster, which embodies our dedication to providing exceptional, technology-driven solutions to our clients. Our in-house development team worked tirelessly to create a truly unique and transformative application by integrating ChatGPT and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Field Services. This milestone is another testament to our commitment to innovation, ensuring that our clients receive unparalleled services, further positioning us ahead of our competitors in the industry.”
The ServeU AI TaskMaster will be an upgrade from the legacy ServeU Technician 2.0 software and makes use of cutting-edge AI algorithms to expedite and streamline FM operations including work order management, asset tracking, and predictive maintenance. With the provision of quicker, precise, and personalised services, this AI-driven approach will increase efficiency, lowers costs, and enhances client satisfaction.
Moreover, the app will offer technicians with real-time data and a user-friendly interface that communicates in their preferred language, enabling better decision-making and providing tailored solutions to clients. This innovative, multilingual feature will be a first in the FM industry, breaking down language barriers and ensuring seamless communication between technicians and clients.
Adhering to SFG20 standards, the ServeU AI TaskMaster app will enable technicians to access critical information and guidelines in their preferred language, a feature previously available only in English. This upgrade will significantly improve technicians’ understanding of the standards and facilitates more effective maintenance and management of assets.
The ServeU AI TaskMaster app is set to be the latest milestone in ServeU’s ongoing digital transformation journey. The company’s investment in advanced technologies and its focus on delivering innovative solutions reiterates its commitment to adapting to the rapidly changing FM landscape and staying ahead of the curve.
With a long-standing history of embracing new technological innovations, ServeU has been committed to improving customer experiences and boosting operational efficiency. The company’s previous initiatives, such as the B2B and B2C mobile applications and CAFM system upgrades, have all contributed to its reputation as a pioneer in the FM industry.
For more information about ServeU and the ServeU AI TaskMaster app, please visit www.serveu.ae.
-end-
About ServeU: ServeU is a leading facilities management (FM) solutions provider in the UAE and a subsidiary of Union Properties. With a strong commitment to innovation and customer satisfaction, ServeU has been delivering exceptional services to clients for over three decades. The company’s extensive range of services includes hard and soft FM solutions, catering to residential, commercial, and industrial sectors. ServeU continually strives to set new industry standards by leveraging cutting-edge technology and delivering state-of-the-art solutions to its clients through its talented in-house development team.
Today on the Academic Minute: Jacob Pellinen, assistant professor of neurology at the University of Colorado School of Medicine, examines why seizures can be hard to diagnose. Learn more about the Academic Minute here.
This article is part of a series on tracking the right metrics using the right methodology to visually display and quantify the investment in learning and prove ROI. What you are about to read is a fable. The company, AshCom, is fictional, but the learning challenges faced by Kathryn, AshCom’s CLO, and her team are real and commonly shared by learning teams in large organizations. It is our hope that you will be able to connect with the characters, their challenges, and the solutions they discover. We also invite you to read the first eBook in the series.
eBook Release
The Learning Scorecard: How To Measure L&D Impact And Prove ROI
This eBook introduces a system to track the right metrics using the right methodology to visually display and quantify the investment in learning and prove ROI.
Kathryn inhaled deeply. She held it for just a second before slowly exhaling. As she did, her mind traveled back over the previous weeks. It had been a whirlwind. She sipped her tea and realized that while some of her thoughts had settled, some still swirled around in her mind.
The last month had been more stressful for Kathryn than any other time in her professional career as a learning leader. Her role as the Chief Learning Officer at AshCom had been filled with challenges that tended to give her energy. Her learning team was made up of smart and driven people. She worked closely with them to meet every challenge that had come their way.
Together, they figured out how to develop a completely new learning system when AshCom acquired a competitor. When their CFO wanted to increase the financial literacy of his managers, Kathryn and her team built a true game that was successful in every way and was one of the most popular learning experiences they’d ever built. Her team built its own mobile app to train the sales force. When a significant portion of AshCom transitioned to working from home, the learning team made the transition. Her team rose to the occasion each time.
The last month was different. AshCom had lost money in the previous quarter, something that had never happened before. In the next two months, things had gotten worse, not better. The poor financial performance was setting off alarm bells throughout the company. Wages were frozen. Any new hires now needed to be approved by Kurtis, the CFO. Tensions were high throughout the entire organization.
Kurtis met with Kathryn and told her that every department was being asked to “Defend the Spend,” their expression for looking at every expenditure in detail. Every leader needed to defend every dollar they were spending and link it to how it would create value for AshCom and improve its financial performance.
Kathryn normally took a team approach in the face of challenges. That would not work now. She needed guidance from someone who had experience in helping learning teams determine the return on investment building learning experiences. Kathryn turned to Amy, a consultant who had spent a lot of time helping Kathryn think through strategy. Amy worked with dozens of large companies and organizations throughout the United States. If anyone could give the right advice, it would be Amy.
Kathryn and Amy met several times. They discussed the threat to the learning team. Amy had seen this pattern repeated in numerous companies that were struggling financially. The first budget cuts and layoffs came to the learning team. Kathryn knew this too. Amy was direct and told Kathryn that she owned this problem, and it was up to her to overcome it.
Amy laid out a path forward that helped Kathryn decide what to measure, how to measure it, and how to make her report visible through a dashboard that would rival those of AshCom’s sales, operations, and human resource teams.
To get a visual overview of the learning impact, they needed to track the right metrics and use the right methodology. Amy recommended a product called The Learning Scorecard, which was built by the learning experts at MindSpring.
Kathryn’s stress level retreated as she realized she could actually accomplish what she was being asked to do. Amy was giving her confidence.
Kathryn knew her own mind. Stress interfered with her ability to be creative and think about the bigger picture. Her style was to lower her shoulders and attack the problem in front of her. This helped her get done what needed to be done, but it limited her time spent thinking strategically.
The Learning Scorecard software and dashboards gave Kathryn confidence that the right solution was coming into focus.
She now had time to think.
She decided to rent a cottage on Gull Lake, which was about an hour north of Minneapolis. The weather was perfect for sitting on the porch and watching the boats go by. She knew that some peace and quiet would not only restore her soul but would also give her time to reflect. It was often in serene settings that she had her best ideas. Not everyone would be comfortable sitting alone for three days. This did not bother Kathryn.
After making sure everything was in order with her family, Kathryn left while it was still dark, made the hour drive, and settled into her new temporary home. She made a cup of tea and went out on the porch just as the lake was waking up. She watched the early morning fishermen come in while the powerboats and jet skis were heading out on the lake. The porch had a large swing hung from the ceiling by heavy ropes. It was large enough to hold a twin-sized mattress so she could sit or lie down if she wanted to. The day was perfect.
Near the top of the legal pad that almost always accompanied her, Kathryn wrote, “The Learning Scorecard.” She and Amy had spent so much time implementing it that she hadn’t had time to think about what else might be possible. Now she had three days.
Next, she wrote “Backwards/Forwards.” It occurred to Kathryn that The Learning Scorecard system gave her clarity on what had happened. As she watched a speedboat glide by, she thought that the boat might represent the learning experience and the wake behind the boat was sort of like the impact of learning. What she was measuring would be what happened after something else happened.
Kathryn did not discount the value of a clear view of what had happened. This is what Kurtis, the CFO of AshCom, was asking for. He wanted to know how behavior was changed through learning. If he could get a quantifiable sense of that, he could compute performance improvement due to learning.
With some easy math that involved the cost of building the learning, he would be able to get to a return-on-investment number. He was already able to do this by adding new employees, changing an operating procedure, or buying new equipment. He would now be able to run similar numbers for learning.
Kathryn started thinking about what sort of patterns would emerge over time. If she and her team could see clearly backward, wasn’t it logical that they would have more clarity looking forward? She wrote another word on her notepad: “Causality.”
In time, Kathryn and her team would be able to see which kinds of learning experiences produced the greatest return on investment. She might even be able to predict the ROI when proposing new learning experiences to the executive team.
It occurred to her that this was not the only usable insight to be gained. She thought about the learning team and causality. She started to write some questions:
More questions rolled through her mind. Was there some modality of learning that learners liked more than others? Could she track learning that was reinforced after the fact compared to learning that was not?
Then she thought about learners. What if different departments tended to react better or worse to certain kinds of learning experiences? What if salespeople preferred a heavier emphasis on gamification while machine operators preferred microlearning in short bursts that they needed in a moment? Maybe managers preferred scenarios that gave them the opportunity to make choices and see outcomes in more real-world situations?
It would take some time before these patterns emerged, but Kathryn knew that she and her team could start looking for them immediately. Every learning experience would have performance data behind it that would guide their decisions moving forward.
Kathryn decided it was time for a break. She took a short swim in the lake, changed, and made herself lunch. Seafood salad in lettuce wraps and more tea.
When back on the swing, she picked up her legal pad, flipped the page, and wrote, “XR” at the top. For more than a year, her learning team had been bringing up augmented and virtual reality. Some members of the team had spent considerable time reading about and playing with virtual reality. One claimed to be addicted to the augmented game Pokémon Go and spent weekends chasing them.
With the financial challenges of AshCom, now was not the right time to put in a request to expand their learning choices into augmented or virtual reality. She knew it would be added expense, at least in the early stages. But Kathryn also knew that the time was coming when her team would need the technology. She and her team would have to become more familiar with it.
The Learning Scorecard would give her team the opportunity to experiment with both realities and compare the results to more traditional forms of learning. Instead of her asking for an increased budget based on new and very cool technology, Kathryn would actually be able to demonstrate learner reaction, learning, and behavioral change. Even more importantly, she would be able to make an ROI case for the technology. She would start small and prove the concept before she asked for a larger financial commitment to the technology.
Kathryn flipped the page. Time for a new topic. She wondered how this kind of measurement would change her learning team. Would this be threatening to them, or would they see it as an opportunity? Being measured and held accountable for outcomes might not be on the top of everyone’s list.
Kathryn thought through each person on her learning team and decided that all of them would welcome this structure because they all had a passion for contributing to people’s growth in knowledge, skills, and opportunities. A few of them might begin to think more like business leaders, moving past intuition and into data-driven decision making.
This was enough for her first day. Kathryn had a list of questions to think about that would occupy the remainder of her time. She was also sure other questions would arise as she sought answers to each one she currently had. She decided to draft an answer to each question and then spend some time with Amy to get her reaction. Sooner rather than later, she would have to have an open conversation with her learning team.
It was time to start thinking about dinner.
Download the eBook The Learning Scorecard: How To Measure L&D Impact And Prove ROI to delve into the data and discover which key metrics your L&D team should consider. You can also join the webinar to discover a completely new approach to measuring ROI.
Dear Reader, if you would like to see a demo of MindSpring’s Learning Scorecard, please click here to schedule a time convenient for you and the learning experts at MindSpring will be happy to walk you through it.
Rising entrepreneur Sehrish Z., Co-Founder & CEO of Xpressocially Media, encourages working women to display their professional talents while balancing family life.
She is a well-known marketeer that helps several companies develop and make an impression through effective digital marketing.
Along with supporting companies, Sehrish has assisted up-and-coming influencers on their path to success and development.
She holds a professional certificate in chartered accounting from ACCA UK and is well-recognised for her role as a mentor for financial activists.
Businesses usually participate in marketing just because they are aware of its importance. Setting measurable objectives enables you to monitor your progress, evaluate what’s working, and pinpoint areas that need improvement. It can be challenging to determine whether your marketing activities are successful without clear objectives.
Contact :
[email protected]
Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Sehrish
Co-Founder & CEO of Xpressocially Media